Photo from ABS-CBN |
Blogger's Notes:
Commentary of an Academic
(Copyright @ 2019 by Chester B Cabalza. All Rights Reserved).
A throng of Filipino backing has pushed
the unconquerable Statement of Support for the Philippines’ onetime Foreign
Secretary Albert del Rosario and erstwhile Ombudswoman Chonchita Morales when a
political action posed to challenge Asia’s strongest leader Xi Jinping of the
People’s Republic of China through an enclosed communication addressed to the International
Criminal Court.
The two respected leaders lodged a 17-page
complaint for environmental damage in the South China Sea and persecution of
Filipino fishermen by Chinese officials before the ICC on March 13, two days before
the first Asian country officially departs from the independent judicial body, founded
under the mantle of the Rome Statute, giving jurisdiction to prosecute global
leaders for crimes against humanity and crimes of aggression.
However Beijing continuously debunks the
accusations of the two former top Philippine officials for their (mis)representation
and intent that has gained fervor support from Presidential Spokesperson and Chief
Presidential legal counsel Salvador Panelo as he considered it a “futile
exercise” for the right of assertion, notwithstanding the fact that the two
state parties are ICC non-members. Undeniably China and the Philippines are archrival
maritime competitors in the South China Sea.
The grievance itself becomes a strong reminder
echoing the Philippines’ unfinished business at how China treats the
Philippines despite a landmark 501-page decided case award it won in the
Permanent Court of Arbitration in July 2016 at The Hague. This groundbreaking
maritime ruling also proceeds to a conclusion that China had violated the
Philippines’ sovereign rights in its exclusive economic zone and held that the
big neighbor interfered with Filipino fishermen at Scarborough Shoal as the
Chinese reconfigured the status of the features of islands and islets in the
contested South China Sea by inflicting irreparable harm to the marine
environment that aggravated the dispute.
That episode saw China’s overriding use
of muscle flexing of hard power by completing a large-scale land reclamation
and construction of artificial islands outwitting the Philippines’ soft power or
the use of lawfare overshadowed by evolving events as the Philippines under
President Rodrigo Duterte befriended China to tame the dragon’s potent puffing
fires. At the same time, the Chinese aggressive campaign flamboyantly spelled
out through economic diplomacy in the form of loans and calculated expansion of
the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) stylishly packaged to bandwagon
with the centrifugal force of Asian century mentality, paving a way for global launching
bonhomie of the Belt Road Initiative and Maritime Silk Road. It emerged as a
result of the boom and bust of public-private partnerships that felt short in
between with a string of fiascoes on debt trap miscalculated by small and middle
markets.
But as the Philippines tries again to
rock the boat against the Chinese paramount leader Xi Jinping, allegedly accused of committing
international crimes against Filipino fishermen and Mother Nature, the Chinese
politburo initially ignored the complaint and will either refuse to participate
in the proceeding or derecognize the jurisdiction, if and when the petition
will be elevated as a case, and consequently as a practice, China will not
abide by any decision of the international court.
The only recourse that China is good at
comes on by exerting a hard power or militarizing the disputed islands to
showcase a use of force and constructive occupation over the presence of its
hundreds of Chinese vessels near the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone in
the West Philippine Sea. The satellite image showing its pronounced presence
near the Thitu or Pag-asa Island, the largest island claimed by the Philippines,
could indicate routine reconnaissance of China’s Navy and Coast Guard forces in
our backyard, choreographed as seasonal fishing activities of myriad Chinese maritime militia to guard their interests as the Philippines upgrades its
decaying facilities in our maritime territory off Pag-asa island.
No comments:
Post a Comment